CEOR programAdel Labs Linkby Adel Labs
Appearance

Surfactant CEOR Project

Chemical EOR Application in Abu Dhabi Carbonate Reservoirs

Four studies on chemical EOR in Abu Dhabi carbonate reservoirs, with two calculators. Each page states its own records and its own status.

Records differ by study: measured carbonate corefloods on study 01, SAMPLE inputs on studies 02 and 03, published literature on study 04.

4
Studies indexed
2
Calculators indexed
1
Manuscript offered here
1
Presentation offered here

01

Chemical EOR in HTHS Carbonates

Carbonate reservoirs hold a major share of conventional oil and dominate the mature provinces of the Middle East. Waterflooding leaves a large fraction of that oil behind: carbonate surfaces trend mixed-to-oil-wet, so capillary forces hold residual oil in films and small pores, and heterogeneity limits how much of the reservoir the injected water contacts. Chemical EOR targets the trapped fraction by changing the fluid–rock physics. Surfactants cut oil–water interfacial tension by orders of magnitude so that trapped oil can mobilise; polymers raise the viscosity of the injected water to improve sweep; both are injected as engineered slugs driven from injector to producer.

The setting studied here allows little margin: reservoir temperatures at and above 100 °C and formation brines beyond 150,000 ppm TDS with high hardness — conditions that destabilise conventional surfactants, raise retention on positively charged calcite, and narrow the workable formulation window. The four projects below share one program question: what does it take — measured trapping thresholds, stable formulations, retention below the economic gate, and honest evidence on polymer elasticity — to make chemical flooding work in Abu Dhabi's carbonates. The investigators on this work are named in the cited publications; this site carries no roster.

Chemical slug train in section, injector to producer A sectional strip of reservoir between an injector on the left and a producer on the right. Chase water drives a polymer bank, which pushes the surfactant slug; oil mobilised at the slug front coalesces into an oil bank ahead of it. The injected volume slider advances all four fronts, and the oil bank reaches the producer at 0.73 pore volumes.
0.45 PV

Oil-bank front x/L 0.62 · breakthrough at 0.73 PV

Chemical slug train in section — chase water drives the polymer bank, which pushes the surfactant slug; mobilised oil coalesces into a bank ahead of the slug and reaches the producer near 0.73 PV. Drag to advance injection. Illustration: the fronts and the breakthrough point are drawn from the figure’s own model, not from a coreflood record.

Interfacial Tension Reduction and Wettability Alteration

Capillary pressure sets the grip: Pc = 2σ cos θ / r for a pore throat of radius r. In an oil-wet pore the contact angle θ, measured through the water phase, exceeds 90°; cos θ is negative, and Pc opposes water entry — the rock holds its oil. Surfactants attack both terms at once. They cut the interfacial tension σ by up to five orders of magnitude, and they alter wettability, pulling θ back through 90°. Shrinking σ collapses the magnitude of Pc; crossing θ = 90° flips its sign, so the pore switches from repelling water to drawing it in, and the film-held oil releases from the surface. The same σ appears in the capillary number Nc = /(φσ): lowering IFT raises Nc by the same orders of magnitude, carrying it past the mobilisation thresholds measured in this program.

Loading the three-dimensional scene

Drag to orbit

Trapping regime Below Nt,crit Nc 1.0 × 10−4 · released 0 / 18
1.0 × 10−4
Trapped oil on an oil-wet carbonate patch — droplets stay pinned below the critical trapping number; mobilisation begins at Nt,crit = 8.47 × 10−4, measured on Core IL in study 01, and the remaining droplets release as Nc rises. Drag to orbit.

Capillary pressure and capillary number — live

23 mN/m
150°

Oil-wet

0.40 cP

u = 1 ft/day (Darcy) · φ = 0.22 · r = 1 μm

Capillary pressure, Pc

Pc = 2σ cos θ / r

−39.8 kPa

Negative — capillary force holds oil

Capillary number, Nc

2.79 × 10−7

Water-wet sandstone onset 1.9 × 10−5
Study 01, measured — carbonate Nt,crit range 8.47 × 10−4 – 2.23 × 10−3

How this was computed

Capillary pressure is evaluated as Pc = 2σ cos θ / r and the capillary number as Nc = /(φσ), both in the browser from the three sliders above and the fixed conditions printed beside them: Darcy velocity 1 ft/day, porosity 0.220 as a fraction, pore-throat radius 1 μm. u is the Darcy velocity, not the interstitial velocity.

The three slider values are illustrative inputs. The reference line at 1.9 × 10−5 is the water-wet sandstone onset from the published literature. The carbonate band is measured, and its records are on the study 01 page.

02

Projects

Four studies and two calculators. Each row states what the page carries and what its manuscript status is; the page itself is the record.

Scroll across to inspect every column.

Project index
No. Study Kind Records Status Page
01 Critical Trapping Numbers and Capillary Desaturation Interactive report Measured carbonate coreflood records Under review at Geoenergy Science and Engineering; preprint available on SSRN. The preprint has not been peer reviewed. Open studycapillary-desaturation.adellabs.com
02 Retention-Controlled Screening of Chemical EOR Screening tool SAMPLE SAMPLE inputs Manuscript prepared; pending review. Interactive materials and supporting files are not currently offered for public access. Open studyretention-screening.adellabs.com
03 Techno-Economic Screening under Retention Uncertainty Screening model SAMPLE SAMPLE base case Under review at Petroleum Research. The manuscript and its data workbook are not distributed from this page. Open studyretention-economics.adellabs.com
04 Viscoelastic Polymer Flooding and Residual-Oil Desaturation Literature synthesis 49 elastic-versus-reference contrasts from 7 published studies In preparation. Not distributed from this page. Open studyviscoelastic-desaturation.adellabs.com
Live calculators
T1 Trapping Number and CDC Toolkit Live tool SAMPLE SAMPLE records Trapping numbers from entered rate, viscosity, interfacial tension and permeability; a fitted desaturation curve; a petroleum unit converter. Open calculatorcdc-calculator.adellabs.com
T2 Chemical EOR Techno-Economics Live tool SAMPLE SAMPLE records A flood design resolved into chemical demand, unit technical cost, net present value and breakeven retention. Open calculatoreconomics-calculator.adellabs.com

03

Manuscripts, Presentations and Data Packages

MS 00

Program Overview

Chemical EOR in Abu Dhabi carbonate reservoirs: the studies read together as one chain of constraints, and where the margins sit.

No files offered here

MS 01

Critical Trapping Numbers and Capillary Desaturation in Mixed-to-Oil-Wet Carbonates under High-Temperature, High-Salinity Surfactant Flooding

Under review at Geoenergy Science and Engineering (Elsevier); preprint available on SSRN. The preprint has not been peer reviewed. Study 01 carries measured core records, and its manuscript and presentation are offered here.

MS 02

A retention-controlled screening framework for chemical EOR in high-temperature, high-salinity carbonate reservoirs

Manuscript prepared; pending review. Interactive materials and supporting files are not currently offered for public access.

No files offered here

MS 03

Techno-economic Screening of Surfactant Flooding in High-Temperature, High-Salinity Carbonates under Retention Uncertainty

Under review at Petroleum Research (KeAi Publishing). The manuscript and its data workbook are not distributed from this page.

No files offered here

MS 04

Viscoelastic Polymer Flooding and Residual-Oil Desaturation: A Criteria-Screened Evidence Synthesis, Carbonate Injectivity Bounds, and Experimental Design

In preparation. Not distributed from this page.

No files offered here